With
Marjorie
Knoller and
Robert Noel
now awaiting
their May 10
sentencing
for the
infamous
dog-mauling
death of
their
neighbor
Diane
Whipple,
lawyers for
Whipple's
partner,
Sharon
Smith, have
turned their
attention to
her pending
wrongful-death
civil suit.
But this
time Knoller
and Noel
aren't the
sole
defendants.
Smith is
also seeking
damages
against
Rudolph
Koppl and
his wife,
Annette
Pucci-Koppl,
owners of
the San
Francisco
apartment
building
where the
January 2001
attack took
place.
Attorney
Michael
Cardoza is
overseeing
Smith's
legal team,
which
includes
representatives
of the
National
Center for
Lesbian
Rights. "I
call this
the A team,"
Cardoza
said. "A for
Alexis.
Diane Alexis
Whipple."
The civil
proceedings,
for which a
date has not
yet been
set, will
focus on
Koppl's
negligence,
since he was
aware of the
dogs'
viciousness,
Cardoza
contends.
"What the
landlord did
[by allowing
Noel and
Knoller to
keep the
dogs] was
unconscionable,"
Cardoza
said. The
civil suit
includes
both
survivor and
wrongful-death
actions and
is the first
time in
California
someone is
being
allowed to
sue for the
wrongful
death of a
same-sex
partner.
Smith could
be awarded a
variety of
damages
under the
wrongful-death
action,
including
for the loss
of her
relationship
and the loss
of income
Whipple
would have
contributed
to their
household,
according to
the NCLR's
Kate Kendell.
But the
largest
damages
being sought
are punitive
damages,
which are
harder to
get "because
the jury
[must] be
convinced
that an
award is
warranted to
punish the
defendants
for their
bad
actions,"
Kendell
said.
Source: Jet
Date: June 25, 2001
Leisa E. Young, mother of Providence
Police Sgt. Cornel Young Jr., killed
last year by fellow officers who
mistook him for a suspect, recently
filed a $20 million lawsuit against
the city of Providence, RI. "I can't
bring my son back," she said. "And I
can't live with myself if I do
nothing about it and it happens to
somebody else." Represented by Atty.
Johnnie Cochran, she also seeks
unspecified punitive damages from
the officers, their supervisors, the
police department and the city. In
the incident (JET, May 8, 2000),
Sgt. Young was off-duty when he was
shot and killed by officers
responding to a report of trouble.
Source: Jet
Date: July
3, 2000
Deborah
C. Carr,
mother of
Larry
Hubbard,
speaks
during a
news
conference
near the
spot where
her son was
shot to
death in the
back of the
head by a
White
Baltimore
police
officer. At
left is
attorney
Johnnie
Cochran, who
filed a $60
million
lawsuit on
behalf of
the family
over the
shooting.
Also shown
are
attorneys A.
Dwight
Pettit and
William H.
Murphy Jr..
Police said
Hubbard, a
suspect in a
car theft,
was
struggling
with Officer
Robert Quick
for his gun
when a
second
officer,
Wayne
Hamilton,
shot him in
the head.
Several
witnesses
said the two
White
officers
beat and
then killed
Hubbard
while he was
on his knees
pleading for
his life.
Named as
defendants
in the suit
are the two
officers,
the acting
police
commissioner
at the time
of the
shooting,
the city of
Baltimore
and the
state of
Maryland.
Source: National Catholic Reporter
Date: February 24, 2005
A Cook County, Ill., judge ruled that Alison Hiller and Todd Parrish can go forward with a lawsuit for wrongful death-against a fertility clinic that mistakenly discarded a frozen embryo from the Chicago couple. Fertility doctors said that it could mean the end of the in vitro fertilization industry, while prolife activists hailed the judge's comment that the Illinois Legislature intended embryos, from the time of conception, to be considered human beings.
Source: Law Reporter
Date: December 2004
The Supreme Court of Mississippi held a wrongful death beneficiary may not assign a wrongful death claim to one tortfeasor to be asserted against another joint tortfeasor.
Here, King's mother or another family member was filling a household generator with gasoline when some gasoline spilled on the floor. Fumes from die gasoline ignited, and King's mother suffered fatal injuries. King, as administrator of her estate, filed a wrongful death action against Rheem, die manufacturer of a gas water heater that was located near the generator, alleging the heater's pilot light had ignited die gasoline vapors. During settlement negotiations, Rheem suggested King join Coleman, die manufacturer of the generator, as an additional defendant. King declined to do so, but in die settlement agreement between the parties, he released Rheem from liability and assigned to it any rights he might have against Coleman. King then filed an amended complaint against Rheem and Coleman. The court subsequently dismissed King's suit and substituted Rheem as the real party in interest. The trial court denied Coleman's motion for summary judgment.
Reversing, die state high court noted diat although Mississippi law generally allows assignment of personal injury claims, this rule does not automatically extend to wrongful death claims. Rather, diese claims are governed by Miss. Code Ann. § 11-7-13, which specifies the individuals who are entitled to bring such actions. Coleman argued that because the statute limits the authority to bring an action to specified individuals and does not specifically allow assignment of actions, assignment of a wrongful death action is not allowed. Finding this argument had merit, the court said the legislature could not have intended to allow a tortfeasor to settle with a wrongful death plaintiff and then subsequently sue putative joint tortfeasors using plaintiff's cause of action. The court reasoned that this would enable parties to circumvent the applicable statute controlling the right of contribution and allocation of fault.
Source: Law Reporter
Date: October 2004
Doe v. Sullivan, U.S. Dist. Ct., D. Minn., No. 02-1235 (JEL/JSM), Oct. 22, 2003.
Doc, 69, and his wife, 59, were crossing a road on foot when a Canadian bus ran a stop sign and struck them. Doe suffered fatal injuries. He had been a retiree and is survived by his wife and five adult sons.
Doe's wife suffered fractures to her neck at C2, humerus, femur, and clavicle, and cognitive injuries, among other injuries, and was in a coma for almost a month. Her past medical expenses of approximately $300,000 were paid by the county blue cross plan. A welfare office worker earning about $30,000 annually, she has been unable to return to work.
Doe's sons from his first marriage, individually, and Doe's wife, individually and on behalf of Doe's estate, sued the bus company and the driver. Doe's sons from his second marriage were trustees in the wrongful death suit. Suit alleged the driver was negligent in running the stop sign.
The parties settled during mediation for $3.1 million, including $2.5 million for the personal injury claim and $600,000 for the wrongful death claim. Doe's sons from the second marriage settled separately for a confidential amount.
Plaintiffs' expert witnesses in this case were Linda K. Graham, life-care planning, Roseville, Minn.; llael Rodning, economics, Rogers, Minn.; and Martin E. Finch, medical illustration, Minneapolis, Minn.
More wrongful death articles below legal issue Submit Form.
Additional
Wrongful Death Lawsuit Information
In general, a wrongful death lawsuit
is a lawsuit regarding a death that was caused by
another person's negligence, recklessness,
malpractice, and sometimes inaction. In such
cases, and depending on state law, families of the
deceased can file a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf
of their loved one. These lawsuits can help
families recover damages for pain, suffering, lost
wages, mental anguish, loss of companionship,
related medical costs, and other expenses that have
resulted and relate to the wrongful death. So,
if you have lost a loved one to a wrongful death
incident, you may be eligible for an award of
damages in the appropriate court. For more details,
you should contact an attorney.
For a free evaluation, you can use the submit form
provided below.
It
is always a better idea to act sooner, rather than
later, when dealing with legal matters. The closer
it is to an accident, the easier time to investigate
and identify who is liable for the injuries that
resulted. This will increase the chances of
recovering a higher amount of compensation for the
personal injury. Some states have set a statute of
limitation on the time frame you must file your
personal injury case that will automatically
disqualify you from recovering any compensation if
you wait too long.
Wrongful Death Case
Example
Date
Facts
Decision (may be
subject to appeal)
4/16/2005
Judith Anderson's
husband was killed in 2003 when his car was hit by a
Schneider National semi-tractor trailer rig when
Bradley fainted. Judith Anderson, individually, and
as representative of the Estate of William Anderson,
sued Thomas Bradley, Schneider National Inc. and
Schneider National Bulk Carriers Inc. claiming that
the defendants' negligence caused the wrongful death
of Mr. Anderson (51 years old). Mrs. Anderson
claimed that Schneider knew that Bradley had health
problems that made it unsafe for him to drive a
vehicle.
Plaintiff's
verdict for $12.5 million.
Past Examples of Wrongful Death Lawsuits:
Automobile Accident
Trucking Accident
Tire Blowout Accident
Airplane Accident
Motorcycle Accident
Careless Actions by Another
Failure to Stop
Workplace Injury
Medical Malpractice
Hospital Negligence
Negligence
Product Liability
Dog Bite
Medicine Malpractice
Surgery Malpractice
Slip Accidents
other areas
Frequently Asked Wrongful Death Questions:
Who might be considered
as the survivors of a victim of wrongful death?
The
survivors of a wrongful death victim may vary
from state to state, but in general, usually the
survivors include the spouse and minor children.
Check with a Lawyer for specifics.
What compensation can be
claimed in a wrongful death case?
Compensation may vary by state or jurisdiction
but some examples include the following: (i)
Expenses incurred by the death of the victim
(funeral, medical, etc.); (ii) Loss of future
earnings anticipated over the lifetime of the
victim; (iii) Benefits lost due to the victims
death (medical insurance, pension, 401K, etc.);
(iv) Survivors pain, suffering and mental
anguish caused by the victims death; (v)
Companionship, care or protection lost to the
survivors as a result of the death and (vi)
General and punitive damages.
Check with a Lawyer for
specifics.
Who can
file a wrongful death claim?
This depends on the individual state law, but in
general the immediate family members (spouses,
children and parents) can file a wrongful death
claim. Some states allow grandparents, legal
dependants and extended family members to file.
Check with a Lawyer for specifics.
Are
there any limitations on who cannot be sued?
This depends on
the individual state law, but in some states, a
family member cannot sue another family member
for wrongful death. Check
with a Lawyer for specifics.
A question that is often asked is,
who has the right to file the
lawsuit. Although the answer
to this question depends on which
state the lawsuit is filed in, in
general immediate family members
(including parents, spouses, and
children) are almost always eligible
to file a claim. For minors,
the law may require the need for an
adult guardian to take a wrongful
death lawsuit to court.
Additionally, other family members -
such as stepparents, grandparents,
and dependents, may also be
permitted to file suit in some
states.
Another common
question what role
can a wrongful death
lawyer play in a
lawsuit. In
general, a wrongful
death attorney can
help you gather
important evidence,
understand the
relevant law,
complete necessary
paperwork and
filings, and prepare
a convincing
lawsuit. Hiring an
attorney can also
help alleviate some
of the stress you
may be experiencing
- by allowing you to
understand your
legal rights.
Depending on state
law and the specific
facts, the type of
damages that may be
recoverable in a
wrongful death
include"
Medical and
funeral costs
Lost wages,
including future
earnings
Lost benefits
Lost inheritance
Pain and
suffering
Mental anguish
Loss of support
or companionship
General damages
Punitive damages
A very important
thing to remember about wrongful
death lawsuits, is that basically
every wrongful death lawsuit is
subject to a statute of limitations.
In general, the statute of
limitations caps the amount of time
that a person who has lost a loved
one has to initiate a wrongful death
lawsuit.
If someone you love has been the victim of wrongful death, you may want to have the facts reviewed by a lawyer.
Submit Your Legal
Question
Welcome to
LawFirmofAmerica.com. The LawFirmofAmerica.com Submit Form
provided below allows you to anonymously submit your legal issue
to a LawFirmofAmerica.com affiliate. Submitting the form
provided below does not create an attorney/client relationship
between you and LawFirmofAmerica.com or any of its affiliates.
Your legal issue will be forwarded to a LawFirmofAmerica.com
affiliate.
Wrongful Death Articles
Continued
Source: Law Reporter
Date:
December 2004
Cournoyer v. Mountain
Creek, N.J., Sussex County
Super. Ct., No.
SSX-L-318-01, Aug. 2, 2004.
Cournoyer, 12, was skiing
on an intermediate slope
when she fell and struck
lier head on a rocky
embankment adjacent to the
trail. She suffred fatal
injuries. She is survived by
her parents and two minor
siblings.
Her father, on behalf of
her estate, sued the ski
slope resort and its owner,
alleging the embankment was
a design flaw that created a
hazardous condition.
Defendants contended
state law provides that
skiers assume the inherent
risks of skiing and thus
Cournoyer assumed the risks
associated with a fall.
Plaintiff countered that the
embankment was not an
inherent risk because it was
not an integral part of the
sport of skiing, and
defendants could have
eliminated it.
The parties settled
before trial for $225,000.
Plaintiff's experts in
this case were John Hanst,
siding, Green Village, N.J.;
Harold Sobel, forensic
pathology, Wayne, N.J.; and
Matityahu Marcus, economics,
Scotch Plains, N.J.
Defendants' expert in
this case was Jasper Shealy,
skiing, Rochester, N.Y.
Source: Law Reporter
Date:
December 2004
Hinson v. Henderson,
Tex., Cherokee County 2d
Jud. Dist. Ct., No.
2002-11-0806, Mar. 2004.
Sarracino, 37, was
driving a pickup truck in
which his wife, Hinson, 28,
and their five children were
passengers. A car traveling
behind them on the highway
rear-ended the pickup truck,
causing it to leave the road
and roll over. Their son, 6,
suffered fatal injuries. He
is survived by his parents
and four minor siblings. The
other occupants of the car
suffered scrapes and
lacerations.
Sarracino and Hinson,
individually and on behalf
of the children, sued the
driver, alleging he had been
driving under the influence
of alcohol and illegal
drugs. Defendant was
convicted of criminal
charges of intoxication
manslaughter and assault and
is now serving a 40-year
prison sentence.
The parties settled
during mediation before
trial for $1.1 million, all
of which will be paid by
defendant's insurer.
Plaintiffs' expert
witness was Miguel Gallegos,
plastic surgery,
Albuquerque, N.M.
Disclaimer
LawFirmofAmerica.com is a network marketing website of individual law firms from each state. As a result, each affiliate firm is in no way connected with any other affiliate firm. The information and materials contained on this web site do not constitute legal advice and are presented without any representation or warranty whatsoever, including as to accuracy or completeness. The information
submitted through this website is not intended to create, and receipt of them does not establish, an attorney-client relationship between you and LawFirmofAmerica.com or any of its affiliates. Depending on your legal issue, the information submitted may be forwarded to another law firm affiliate other than the law firms listed on this website.
No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be
performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other
lawyers.